Janel Grant submitted an opposition challenging attempts by Vince McMahon, John Laurinaitis, and World Wrestling Entertainment to pause the discovery phase in her lawsuit. The defendants argue the case belongs in private arbitration, contrary to Grant’s position.
Grant’s legal representatives assert the defendants lack sufficient reason, or “good cause,” to stop discovery proceedings. Furthermore, they highlight that a formal motion to compel arbitration has not actually been presented to the court.
The filing from Grant’s team states, “Defendants argue that this Court should stay discovery simply on the basis of a motion to compel arbitration that has not yet been filed, is not pending before this Court, and that the Court has explicitly instructed them not to renew at this time.” Additionally, Grant’s side cites Connecticut caselaw, suggesting discovery typically continues even when dispositive motions are pending.
Related content
Grant’s opposition also raises questions about the arbitration agreement itself, mentioning potential issues like “duress and coercion” during its formation and communications linked to the crime-fraud exception. Her team indicated plans “seeking targeted discovery at the appropriate time to assist the Court in assessing its jurisdiction over this matter.”
The filing notes that a previous government-requested stay has been lifted, obligating Grant to advance the case. Judge Sarah F. Russell is set to rule on whether discovery can commence before deciding on the arbitration matter.
READ MORE: Major WWE Blunder Makes Headlines in Mexico Newspapers
